Frankly, carmex reviews for a long time wanted to write something on the subject, but did not dare. Find a rational basis of our actions in the international arena sometimes trivial task. Contradictions are obvious. carmex reviews For example, we are arguing about the fate of Syria with the Americans, Europeans, Turks and Saudis, but did not sell missiles to Syria "Iskander-E" carmex reviews and air defense S-300PMU2. Exactly the same thing is happening in the situation in Iran: like we are against a military solution to the problems of its "nuclear program" and built them "Bushehr" NPP, but support sanctions against the country and sold them all the same C-300 that would significantly hampered carmex reviews the conduct of offensive carmex reviews air operations the U.S. and Israel. (The fact that the active phase of the war is to begin air strikes can not be questioned). When that relationship between Syria and Iran is obvious.
In our NATO military carmex reviews doctrine called major threat to security (see "Military Doctrine"), and on the missile defense issue is not only the deaf hear, but it was with the U.S., we are pursuing a policy of "reset" and signed an agreement on the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3 ). Long-term carmex reviews presence of NATO and the U.S. in Afghanistan and Central Asia is seen as a strategic threat, but at the same time, our country provides them with the "northern route" for the transportation of military and non-military goods (see "Ulyanovsk transit").
Or there are other examples. It consolidated the position of Russia and China in the UN Security Council is a major obstacle for America in Syria. Thus, China is often considered as the main ally of Russia (such alliance, along with the BRICS, a significant source of phobias in the West), the more that we are made in the general regional organization - the SCO. Nevertheless, we have stopped the delivery of modern carmex reviews weapons to China (see the history of the Su-35) justifying carmex reviews this risk leakage of technology. At the same time, our country organized a joint India (!) Project to produce fighters 5th generation (FGFA), delivering heavy weapons and ammunition, and actually build an aircraft carrier ("Vikramaditya"). It may be recalled that India is considered as one of the main geopolitical rivals China and these countries have a long history of military confrontation. If this is not enough, it will be recalled to supply frigates Ave 11661 "Cheetah" and six diesel-electric submarines of 636 "Varshavyanka" in Vietnam, which denies carmex reviews China territorial affiliation resource-rich Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands. At least, Russia's actions can be described as ambivalent. What could be a necessary and sufficient carmex reviews basis of such policies?
Tags RES, China, Japan, Russia's foreign policy, domestic politics, geopolitics, only ally, industrialization, books, Space Odyssey, carmex reviews migration, the peaceful atom, paranoia, peak oil, limits to growth, food security. , Shale revolution, philosophy, ecology, energy policy
No comments:
Post a Comment