This simply means that if you pass up companies will be responsible for everything legal on the pos

Thailand News English Version Beginner Series Business Digital Advertising E-Commerce Mobile and Tablet gwdihw industry Social Media Startup Story How To Gadgets Review Interview Recommended Books Jobs PR News TV Event.
This term, as we heard the news about the web. The United States came out against the law SOPA or "Stop Online Piracy Act body"? Well I was wondering what SOPA and why is it so important to people in the Internet sphere. I read this is that we took out key information in Wikipedia. And edited collection of many Simple source of small Up for you If not, it's simple gwdihw enough. "Help gwdihw us digest" them by commenting below it.
Draft legislation to stop online piracy (SOPA - Stop Online Piracy Act) is drafting legislation that Lamar Smith (Lamar Smith) Member U.S. House of Representatives. Presented to Parliament The objective is to expand the ability of law enforcement and copyright holders in order to combat the abuse of intellectual property and counterfeit goods in the online world. And is now being considered by the Commission in the field of Justice of the House of Representatives. gwdihw Which is likely to pass by, although there is likely to stop them.
If the Act is passed Department of Justice and copyright holders of the content. Can request the court to order the crackdown on piracy, such Imagine gwdihw simple. That the following can suspend the online advertising network. Search engine include links to banned sites. That could fall into the wrong these intellectual piracy.
Who can I lose? Who owns the intellectual property rights. Support each other because the law will enhance the enforcement of copyright laws more effectively. While the dissent came out alone. This implies an Act to censor the Internet (Internet Censorship), and as a result, cripple the Internet. And threatens the freedom to express their opinions.
This simply means that if you pass up companies will be responsible for everything legal on the post. Websites like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Wikipedia or open web, wherever the user to create their own content, they are not immune to this law. Once this law is approved, the law up. Organization is to be the guardian of the interests of the copyright owner. It will come off the various websites Imagine that sites like Wikipedia, gwdihw the free encyclopedia will be closed down. We purchased an encyclopedia like software. Or even through traditional media The TV will not play the story. Because they can benefit to the full. If no one took their items to upload to YouTube.
The Thailand you think? It reflects nothing back in Thailand in? Thailand people learn? Thumbsup similar idea to the Editor Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia that. Copyright law is good law, we respect it, but SOPA is too restrictive. Or do you think otherwise. Or Thailand, Arizona and others. Do not have to struggle a lot because, I do not have the right to freedom of the Internet, anyway? Real or not?
"Thumbs up" to the Tech Professionals Community Worker Digital everyone. We have news, articles, and digital business knowledge, both Thailand and abroad from our perspective. Subsidiary to be easy and accessible to everyone. In this way you have to concede that ... We also held both the Startup Event General Digital and Digital Marketing Recently, we are proud to say that I am the Official partner of a global organization with Econsultancy in touch with us. http://www.facebook.com/thumbsupTH and http://www.twitter.com/thumbsupTH
Anna Nova screwed here
Bay or constructive criticism Culpable to form? Not culpable for the destruction Took out that rude .. then we would let freedom any more? (But this size are not free? YouTube is littered with the web you think. Or not true?)? Independent gwdihw on me? I do not think we saw any web. That it would not show any obscene declarations page YouTube.
It reflects nothing back in Thailand in? Reply Liberties (Liberty) true No I'm not on this earth are a group of people who like to claim that we lack freedom of criticism, etc., and would like to resolve legal claims that, because a good life does not have to rule it. Rules or regulations, they can be used together or suppress the bad.
The real problem, it is 'Letter law' apart.
- One fine ICT would block any website. Without advance reasons Size Web at youtube, softpedia got a page that "may" unlawfully gwdihw (the court has not ordered wrong with it) just a single page, it blocks lifted the web for months gwdihw - people have the right part what content we want. to block Any content we do not want to block? There are, however, people have mysterious powers to take off than the web itself over time - if you have a washing machine in the web server in question. Police invade catch a lift to the server. By web for a hundred innocent. But the service is on the same host with Nemesis.
Minecraft But there should gwdihw be a conscience in action here? For some actions it is too vulgar. It makes many people feel. It is beyond the scope I have called for limiting freedom is? So if we know the extent And impossibility Jersey or comments constructive. To form the culpable Not culpable for the destruction Took out that rude? Freedom is not blocking remain in our country ..
I think it's rude or not it is a different story as well. People being attacked or disliked.